These are chat archives for
Sign in to start talking
May 15 2016 08:44
, looks neat, I didn't even think of forSome
May 15 2016 08:45
yep, i think it conveys the meaning quite good
i also optimised
May 15 2016 08:46
Yeah, I intended it for a 204, but I see you found other uses too.
May 15 2016 08:47
yep, i was quite happy that it can finally represent a case where no type information is defined for the response (which is still valid swagger spec)
I'll do the APIb part next week then
a huge thanks for the contribution :clap: :)
May 15 2016 08:51
Always happy to.